Write first. Structure later. Think clearly with AI that shows you the logic.
ElieeI noticed your claim about direct sales lacks supporting evidence. Want me to help you find data?
Add a comparison of sales capacity vs projected demand.
"Sales capacity" assumption is untested.
For the moments when thinking clearly actually matters.
Everything you need to think better
Like Google Docs, but built for structured thinking. AI understands your reasoning, not just your words.
Rich Documents
Write naturally with formatting
Semantic Blocks
Tag claims, assumptions, risks
Logic Maps
Visualize argument structure
AI Assistant
Chat about your document
Gap Detection
Find holes in your reasoning
Risk Analysis
Surface hidden assumptions
Export Anywhere
PDF, share, or publish
Collaboration
Share with your team
Tag your thinking with semantic blocks
Not everything you write carries equal weight. Mark claims, assumptions, evidence, decisions, and risks. Watch your reasoning gain structure without losing flow.
Assumption "product ready" is untested. Validate before committing resources.
One click to see the shape of your thinking
When your doc gets long and ideas start tangling, hit Visualize. AI extracts the logic into a map. See dependencies, spot gaps, understand the flow.
The diagram updates as you write. Edit either side.
AI that understands your reasoning graph
Not generic editing. Select text and get graph-aware actions: "Paraphrase while preserving this claim" or "Find analogies connecting this node to earlier ideas."
Cmd+K opens actions that know your argument structure.
Actions understand node relationships and preserve your argument structure.
Edit either side. Changes sync automatically.
Bi-directional: text and graph stay in sync
Edit your document, the graph updates. Reorganize nodes in the graph, trigger a rewrite. Your structure and prose work together, not against each other.
Merge nodes, reorder arguments, and watch your document restructure.
AI that questions your assumptions
Not just summarization. Eliee surfaces what's missing: contradictions in your logic, assumptions you haven't validated, second-order effects you didn't consider.
Think of it as a thinking partner, not a yes-man.
"Product ready" is assumed but no evidence supports this claim.
Resource drain risk conflicts with aggressive Q4 timeline.
Consider pilot program with 2-3 enterprise customers before full commit.
For anyone who needs to think before they act.
Founders
planning strategy
Researchers
structuring arguments
Students
writing theses
Teams
making decisions